YourOrganization@DataCite
/Do you know where your organization outputs are? This tool helps you find them, check the completeness of their metadata, and supports metadata improvement across the entire open science landscape.
Read MoreDo you know where your organization outputs are? This tool helps you find them, check the completeness of their metadata, and supports metadata improvement across the entire open science landscape.
Read MoreCan changes in metadata completeness be combined with repository activity to retroactively document successful re-curation projects? An effort to improve interoperability across four ETH repositories is showing results!
Read MoreThese tools facilitate finding your metadata across all of DataCite and identifying opportunities for improvements that support all of the FAIR use cases. The also support exploration of repository histories, analysis of metadata connectivity and re-curation activity across the history of the repository.
Read MoreMany repositories do difficult metadata work that remains invisible and many time unacknowledged by communities that depend on good metadata to discover and understand data. Our repository tools can help repositories tell their stories and make that invisible work visible. Three examples are presented here.
Read MoreIt has been a decade since the creation of the FAIR Principles and DataCite Metadata Schema Version 4. Which repositories have improved their metadata to address the FAIR Principles during this decade?
Read MoreNeed to keep track of improvements to your metadata? Try our new Re-Curation watch tool.
Read MoreIn metadata land, one might say that “the details are in the details”. DataCite has options for providing details that can be used to help demonstrate research integrity.
Read MoreCan recent work on measuring metadata FAIRness and identifying bright spots help communities plan and facilitate the metadata improvement process?
Read MoreDataCite provides some rich capabilites for supporting three important project metadata use cases: Project Teams, Project Items, and Project Relations. Almost 70 repositories are taking advantage of these capabilities and their metadata provide a corpus that can be used to describe how they are using the metadata. We use the techniques developed for FAIR Use Cases to characterize Project Use Cases using Metadata Game Changers as an example, then we introduce a tool that repositories can use to explore existing approaches to Project metadata and to measure their own projects.
Read MoreA new collaboration between GREI and Metadata Game Changers delivers an open-source tool to help any repository visualize, measure, and enhance metadata completeness.
Read MoreThe DataCite Community includes over 3000 repositories operated by over 1700 members. Bright Spots serve as examples that the entire community can learn from to overcome obstacles and develop effective processes for creating more complete metadata. It is our pleasure to identify repositories and consortia with outstanding metadata completeness and repositories that have improved their metadata in the last six months. Congratulations to all - keep up the good work!
Read MoreMost (89%) of the metadata records in the global research infrastructure that include funder metadata also include identifiers for the awards made by funders (award numbers). Can these award metadata be used to help identify metadata errors related to acronyms and tricky organization names?
Read MoreDataCite metadata has the tools needed to track contributions from specific awards but there are many obstacles on the journey of award numbers into complete metadata. This post explores the landscape. Funder names and identifiers, i.e. Crossref Funder IDs and RORs, are more common than award numbers.
Read MoreComparison of Crossref Participation Report data shows remarkable growth in the percentage of abstracts, ORCID iDs, licenses and resource links in Crossref metadata over the last six years. Many thanks to Crossref for building the foundation!
Read MoreThe DataCite metadata schema recently added “Coverage” to the dateType vocabulary. This adds important capabilities for describing recently added resource types: awards, instruments, and projects.
Read MoreThe DataCite community includes repositories that have overcome obstacles that the whole community faces to create metadata that are very complete for four FAIR use cases. Over 3000 DataCite repositories were analyzed and ten Bright Spots are recognized for outstanding completeness above 49%. Congratulations and thanks to these repositories as great examples for all of us.
Read MoreThe DataCite metadata schema continues to improve, increasing the number of resource types that can be described, the number of relations between resources, and the number of identifiers. Together these improvements continue the long-term trend towards more FAIR research resources connected to form a growing global research infrastructure.
Read More2024 was a banner year for dataset resources in DataCite. The National Institute of Fusion Science registered over 10,000,000 datasets. These metadata are remarkably complete - a bright spot demonstrating great metadata at scale.
Read MoreThe DataCite metadata schema provides many options for describing relations between research objects. This talk, from the Winter 2025 ESIP meeting, describes how the most common relationTyprs are used, opportunities for more detail in DataCite metadata, and measures of repository connectivity with bright-spots.
Read MoreDataCite facets can provide overviews of DataCite repositories and also provide insights into repository characteristics and potential opportunities for improving repository content. Contact us if you would like a complimentary report for your repository.
Read MoreI have worked in scientific data management for many years and enjoy working with organizations and communities that share data and knowledge. I am fluent in metadata standards and dialects used in scientific data management and publishing.
We are constantly working to help you change your metadata game. If you have any questions, suggestions, or crazy ideas, please send contact us or connect with us through the details below.
Ted Habermann
ted@metadatagamechangers.com
ORCID | LinkedIn | Twitter
Erin Robinson
erin@metadatagamechangers.com
ORCID | LinkedIn | Twitter
or use this form.
Search the site:
Powered by Squarespace.